IV - Early Emergency Funding

Prior to 2010, loan assistance to States was made primarily via bilateral agreements (to Latvia, Hungary, Romania, 1st round of Greek loan assistance).  
The European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM) and the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) are two temporary emergency funds, both resulting from the turbulent political weekend of 7-9 May 2010. On May 9, a Decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Euro Area Member States was adopted expressing agreement on both funds.      
The EFSM is based on a ‘Council regulation establishing a European financial stabilisation mechanism’ of May 11, 2010 adopted on the basis of article 122(2) TFEU and therefore binding on all 27 member states of the EU.     
The EFSF is a special purpose vehicle created under Luxembourgish private law by the 17 member states of the Eurozone. The EFSF Framework Agreement was signed on June 7, 2010. On June 24, 2011, the Heads of State or Government of the Eurozone agreed to increase the EFSF’s scope of activity and increase its guarantee commitments.
http://www.efsf.europa.eu/attachments/20111019_efsf_framework_agreement_en.pdf and http://www.efsf.europa.eu/attachments/faq_en.pdf)

What political/legal difficulties
did Bulgaria encounter in the negotiation of the EFSF and the EFSM, in particular in relation to (budgetary) sovereignty, constitutional law, socio-economic fundamental rights, and the budgetary process?

The information is not publicly available. Furthermore, no debates relating to this question were found in the verbatim records of the Bulgarian National Assembly.

Entry into Force     
Article 1(1) EFSF Framework Agreement provides that it will enter into force if sufficient Eurozone member states have concluded all procedures necessary under their respective national laws to ensure that their obligations shall come into immediate force and effect and provided written confirmation of this. What does this procedure look like in Bulgaria and in what way does it involve Parliament?

Bulgaria is still not a Eurozone Member State and as such this question is not applicable to it.

Member states are obliged to issue Guarantees under the EFSF. What procedure was used for this in Bulgaria? What debates have arisen during this procedure, in particular in relation to the implications of the guarantees for (budgetary) sovereignty, constitutional law
, socio-economic fundamental rights, and the budgetary process?

Not applicable to Bulgaria as Bulgaria was not obliged to issue such Guarantees.

Activation problems      
What political/legal difficulties
did Bulgaria encounter during the national procedures related to the entry into force of the EFSF Framework Agreement and/or the issuance and increase of guarantees?

Not applicable to Bulgaria.

Case law     
Is there a (constitutional) court judgment about the EFSM or EFSF in Bulgaria?

The EFSF has not been litigated at the BCC.

What is the role of Parliament in the application of the EFSF, for example with regard to decisions on aid packages (Loan Facility Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding) and the disbursement of tranches, both of which need unanimous approval by the so-called Guarantors, i.e. the Eurozone member states?

Not applicable to Bulgaria.

Implementing problems 
What political/legal difficulties
did Bulgaria encounter in the application of the EFSF?

Not applicable to Bulgaria.

Bilateral support    
In case Bulgaria participated in providing funding on a bilateral basis to other EU Member States during the crisis, what relevant Parliamentary debates or legal issues have arisen?

No, Bulgaria did not participate in the provision of funding on a bilateral basis to other EU Member States.

What other information is relevant with regard to Bulgaria and the EFSM/EFSF?

Not other relevant information.